1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 15 N.Y.3d
  5. 15 N.Y.3d 764 (2010)
 

PEOPLE v. DIAZ

15 N.Y.3d 764 (2010)

933 N.E.2d 751

907 N.Y.S.2d 152

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID DIAZ, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided July 1, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Segal , New York City, for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. , District Attorney, New York City ( Malancha Chanda and Eleanor Ostrow of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 621 [1983]), the trial evidence was sufficient to allow a jury to infer both that defendant exercised dominion and control over the van from which police recovered over four ounces of crack cocaine, and that defendant had knowledge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases