Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The record supports the hearing court's determination that the pretrial identification procedure was not unduly suggestive. Accordingly, the hearing court properly denied suppression of the identification testimony of the witness who identified the defendant during that procedure (see People v Chipp,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.