WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

3033, 117236/01.

74 A.D.3d 551 (2010)

902 N.Y.S.2d 350

WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Appellant, and CNA INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. CHUBB INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. MCI WORLDCOM NETWORK SERVICES, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided June 15, 2010.


The court, in a well-reasoned decision, properly found endorsement 30 in the 1992-1995 policies at issue unambiguous in providing that MCI is liable for its own defense costs. Contrary to MCI's contention, the provision is not an exclusion (see Pav-Lak Indus., Inc. v Arch Ins. Co., 56 A.D.3d 287, 288 [2008]). Absent ambiguity, extrinsic evidence is inadmissible. Nor is there a need to resort to contra proferentem, which, in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases