Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying leave to amend, since plaintiff's proposed claim of fraudulent inducement was not viable (see e.g. Thomas Crimmins Contr. Co. v City of New York,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SEHERA FOOD SERVICES INC. v. EMPIRE STATE BUILDING COMPANY L.L.C.
3026N, 108325/07.
74 A.D.3d 542 (2010)
903 N.Y.S.2d 364
SEHERA FOOD SERVICES INC., Doing Business as APPLE CAFÉ, Appellant, v. EMPIRE STATE BUILDING COMPANY L.L.C., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 10, 2010.
Decided June 10, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.