Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the arresting detective should not have been allowed to testify as an expert is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to review that contention in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the jury verdict was not inconsistent. Inasmuch as possession is not a necessary element of criminal sale of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
