1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 73 A.D.3d
  5. 73 A.D.3d 572 (2010)
 

PEOPLE v. PICON

2839, 1633/06

73 A.D.3d 572 (2010)

902 N.Y.S.2d 518

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MANUEL PICON, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 20, 2010.

The court properly permitted the People to introduce a recording of the victim's 911 call, since it was sufficiently prompt under the circumstances to qualify under the prompt outcry exception to the hearsay rule (see People v McDaniel, 81 N.Y.2d 10 [1993]; People v Archbold, 40 A.D.3d 403 [2007], lv denied 9 N.Y.3d 872 [2007]; People v Vanterpool, 

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases