We agree with plaintiffs that we should not conclude that Supreme Court erroneously relied on parol evidence to create an ambiguity in section 5.7 (a) of the asset purchase agreement. But section 5.7 (a) is unambiguous and Supreme Court should have granted defendant's motion to dismiss the first cause of action.
It is undisputed that pursuant to their written employment agreements, the two individuals (who are both employees and principals of defendant) collectively...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
