1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 73 A.D.3d
  5. 73 A.D.3d 861 (2010)
 

JAMAL v. SCARSDALE AUTO CLINIC, INC.

2009-05491

73 A.D.3d 861 (2010)

899 N.Y.S.2d 886

JEANINE JAMAL et al., Respondents, v. SCARSDALE AUTO CLINIC, INC., et al., Respondents, and JAMES F. LAPORTE et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided May 11, 2010.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The proponent of a motion for summary judgment must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324 [1986]; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases