SORIANO v. INOA

2728, 28970/02

73 A.D.3d 459 (2010)

899 N.Y.S.2d 614

HARRY SORIANO, Appellant, v. ROSA INOA et al., Defendants, and CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 6, 2010.


It is unclear from the trial record whether Dr. Gutstein was an expert witness as to whom CPLR 3101(d) notice was required, or plaintiff's treating physician, as to whom no notice was required (see e.g. Breen v Laric Entertainment Corp., 2 A.D.3d 298, 299-300 [2003]). Moreover, it is clear that the prejudice to defendants arose from the lack of proper authorizations for medical records and not from the report annexed to plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases