1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 73 A.D.3d
  5. 73 A.D.3d 442 (2010)
 

SULLIVAN & WORCESTER LLP v. TAKIEDDINE

2720N, 111249/09

73 A.D.3d 442 (2010)

899 N.Y.S.2d 609

SULLIVAN & WORCESTER LLP, Appellant, v. ZIAD TAKIEDDINE, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 4, 2010.

The denial of an attachment was a provident exercise of the court's discretion, as there was no showing that a potential arbitration award may be rendered ineffectual without an attachment (see Matter of H.I.G. Capital Mgt. v Ligator, 233 A.D.2d 270 [1996]). Petitioner's papers contain no details as to respondent's financial condition, nor is there any assertion that respondent "will secrete, dissipate or otherwise squander...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases