WEINBERG v. OKAPI TAXI, INC.

2712, 100880/06

73 A.D.3d 439 (2010)

899 N.Y.S.2d 597

JOSHUA WEINBERG, Appellant, v. OKAPI TAXI, INC., et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 4, 2010.


Plaintiff failed to rebut defendants' prima facie showing that there was no "permanent consequential limitation" or "significant limitation" of use of his ankle (Insurance Law § 5102[d]). Plaintiff's orthopedist consistently reported a full range of motion of the ankle. Plaintiff claims limitations as to prolonged standing, walking, kneeling, or sitting, but he sets forth no objective basis for comparing these limitations ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases