Contrary to respondent Elizabeth B.'s contention, the court attempted to develop a plan consistent with her lack of cooperation when it appointed Mental Health Legal Service counsel to act as go-between for the parties in applying for Social Security benefits for respondent and finding her appropriate alternative housing (see Mental Hygiene Law §§ 81.15, 81.22[a] [9]). Nevertheless, no alternative housing was found. Although petitioner did not specify all...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.