JONES v. 636 HOLDING CORP.

2691, 13377/02

73 A.D.3d 409 (2010)

899 N.Y.S.2d 605

DUVAUGH JONES, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, SHINILLIS CLINE, et al., Respondents, v. 636 HOLDING CORP. et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 4, 2010.


Successive motions for summary judgment should not be entertained without a showing of newly discovered evidence or other sufficient justification (see Phoenix Four v Albertini, 245 A.D.2d 166 [1997]). In this action for personal injury resulting from a courtyard shooting, the "new" evidence presented on the follow-up motion for summary relief, consisting of an affidavit from a forensic pathologist, was clearly available to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases