1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 73 A.D.3d
  5. 73 A.D.3d 407 (2010)
 

HINTON v. CITY OF NEW YORK

2686, 14126/07

73 A.D.3d 407 (2010)

901 N.Y.S.2d 21

PORTIA A. HINTON, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 4, 2010.

Defendants made a prima facie showing that they were under no duty of care requiring installation of a guardrail or other safety measures designed to prevent a fall like this, by submitting their employees' deposition testimony that no prior accidents like this had occurred, and an expert's affidavit that neither the then-applicable New York City Building Code nor OSHA regulations required that guardrails be erected at the loading...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases