Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to renew his opposition to the defendants' cross motion, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, since the new evidence he submitted would not have warranted denial of the cross motion (see CPLR 2221 [e]; Khan v Nelson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.