FUTERSAK v. PERL

004825/09.

27 Misc.3d 897 (2010)

897 N.Y.S.2d 886

SAM FUTERSAK, Also Known as SAM OLSHIN, Plaintiff, v. SHELDON PERL, Also Known as SHLOIME PERL, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Nassau County.

Decided March 25, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Cirrito , Hempstead, for defendants.

Daniel Hirschel , Valley Stream, for plaintiff.


OPINION OF THE COURT

IRA B. WARSHAWSKY, J.

Preliminary Statement

Defendants move for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint in motion sequence No. 1. Defendants argue that plaintiff provided defendants with unlicensed real estate brokerage services; therefore, section 442-d of the Real Property Law precludes plaintiff's recovery. Plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment on its causes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases