1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 71 A.D.3d
  5. 71 A.D.3d 889 (2010)
 

MATTER OF DOE v. CUOMO

2009-04351.

71 A.D.3d 889 (2010)

895 N.Y.S.2d 833

In the Matter of JOHN DOE, Appellant, v. ANDREW M. CUOMO, Attorney General of the State of New York, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided March 16, 2010.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The extraordinary remedy of prohibition may only be granted if the petitioner establishes a clear legal right to that relief (see Matter of Haggerty v Himelein, 89 N.Y.2d 431, 435 [1997]; Matter of B. T. Prods. v Barr, 44 N.Y.2d 226, 230 [1978]). The remedy is confined to judicial or quasi...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases