In concluding that "[t]here is no life style that must be maintained here," the Special Referee focused disproportionately on the parties' standard of living during the first eight years following their immigration to this country from the Soviet Union and failed to give due consideration to their standard of living during the seven years before the commencement of this action (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6]; Hartog v Hartog,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
POBERESKY v. POBERESKY
2383 350506/05
71 A.D.3d 516 (2010)
897 N.Y.S.2d 401
BERTA POBERESKY, Appellant, v. LEV POBERESKY, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 16, 2010.
Decided March 16, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
