Defendants-appellants met their initial burden of presenting objective medical evidence that the injured plaintiffs had not suffered a permanent consequential limitation of a body organ or a significant limitation of use of a body function or system through the affirmed reports of their medical experts (see Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; Christian v Waite,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SANTIAGO v. BHUIYAN
2340, 7705/07
71 A.D.3d 485 (2010)
894 N.Y.S.2d 879
ALEJANDRO SANTIAGO et al., Respondent, v. OMAR BHUIYAN et al., Appellants, and EDWIN M. LOPEZ et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 11, 2010.
Decided March 11, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.