The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility. Although appellant's personal role consisted of hitting the victim with his fist, the credible evidence, including that of a police officer who saw the entire incident, clearly established appellant's accessorial liability (see Penal Law § 20.00) for the acts of another participant who struck the victim with a bat.<...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
