Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in limiting the plaintiff's proof at trial to the only cause of action which it pleaded in its complaint, to wit, an accounting, and in excluding any evidence relating to an alleged fraudulent transfer. The complaint failed to adequately plead or otherwise apprise the defendant of any claim based upon fraud and/or fraudulent transfer (see CPLR 3016[b];
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.