Plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact in opposition to defendants' prima facie showing that he did not suffer a serious injury of either a permanent or a nonpermanent nature. While his experts quantified his losses in range of motion in 2007 and 2008 and opined that he suffered permanent injuries that were caused by the subject car accident, none of the experts provided range of motion assessments contemporaneous with the 2003 accident (see Mullings v Huntwork,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
RIVERA v. HONEY EXPRESS CAB CORP.
70 A.D.3d 578 (2010)
894 N.Y.S.2d 433
JOSE RIVERA, Appellant, v. HONEY EXPRESS CAB CORP. et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 25, 2010.
Decided February 25, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
