1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 70 A.D.3d
  5. 70 A.D.3d 519 (2010)
 

BOGDANOVIC v. CITY OF NEW YORK

70 A.D.3d 519 (2010)

893 N.Y.S.2d 867

DULJO BOGDANOVIC et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, and NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided February 18, 2010.

We see no reason to reduce the damages awarded to plaintiff for future earnings for a period of 20 years, where the medical evidence established that plaintiff would only be able to work part-time as a result of his injuries, and where the damages awarded by the jury were less than half the sum projected in uncontradicted testimony by plaintiff's economist (cf. Flores v Parkchester Preserv. Co., L.P., 42 A.D.3d 318 [2007], lv...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases