ONE HUNDRED GRAND, INC. v. CHAPLIN


70 A.D.3d 513 (2010)

895 N.Y.S.2d 68

ONE HUNDRED GRAND, INC., Respondent, v. KAREN CHAPLIN, Formerly Known as KAREN ROCHON, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided February 18, 2010.


In this commercial nonpayment proceeding, the relevant provisions of the landlord's offering plan and the parties' lease were ambiguous, i.e., "reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation" (Chimart Assoc. v Paul, 66 N.Y.2d 570, 573 [1986]), as to how "additional rent" for increased building expenses was to be calculated for the commercial space. Thus, Appellate Term properly looked to evidence of the parties' course of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases