PEOPLE v. FRANCOIS

No. 84 SSM 62

14 N.Y.3d 732 (2010)

923 N.E.2d 583

896 N.Y.S.2d 300

2010 NY Slip Op 1019

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JERRY FRANCOIS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided February 11, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Legal Aid Society, Criminal Appeals Bureau, New York City (Laura Liberman Cohen, Blaine [Fin] V. Fogg, Steven Banks and Seymour W. James, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Lindsey M. Kneipper and Eleanor Ostrow of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The Appellate Division's determination that the officer's conduct did not elevate his encounter with defendant from a common-law inquiry to a seizure necessitating reasonable suspicion constitutes a resolution of a mixed question of law and fact that is supported by the record evidence (see generally People v Wheeler, 2 N.Y.3d 370

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases