MATTER OF FLORES-TULLY v. CITY OF NEW YORK DEPT. OF HOUS. PRESERV. & DEV.


70 A.D.3d 823 (2010)

894 N.Y.S.2d 506

In the Matter of NELLY FLORES-TULLY, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided February 9, 2010.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the determination that she did not have succession rights to apartment 4-M (hereinafter the subject apartment), in the building owned by the respondent Dayton Towers Corporation (hereinafter Dayton), was not arbitrary and capricious and had a rational basis (see generally Matter of Peckham v Calogero, 12 N.Y.3d 424, 431...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases