1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 70 A.D.3d
  5. 70 A.D.3d 810 (2010)
 

SPODEK v. NEISS

70 A.D.3d 810 (2010)

892 N.Y.S.2d 914

J. LEONARD SPODEK, Also Known as LEONARD SPODEK, et al., Respondents, v. CHARLES NEISS et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided February 9, 2010.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

"The supervision of disclosure and the setting of reasonable terms and conditions therefor rests within the sound discretion of the trial court and, absent an improvident exercise of that discretion, its determination will not be disturbed" (Mattocks v White Motor Corp., 258 A.D.2d 628, 629 [1999] [citations omitted]; see Olexa v Jacobs, 36 A.D.3d 776...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases