1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 70 A.D.3d
  5. 70 A.D.3d 708 (2010)
 

MATTER OF WEST BUSHWICK URBAN RENEWAL AREA, PHASE 2. 534 BUSHWICK AVENUE CORPORATION

70 A.D.3d 708 (2010)

892 N.Y.S.2d 889

In the Matter of WEST BUSHWICK URBAN RENEWAL AREA, PHASE 2. 534 BUSHWICK AVENUE CORPORATION et al., Appellants; CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided February 2, 2010.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Where an "improvement is inconsistent with the highest and best use of the property, the claimant is not entitled to compensation for that improvement" (Matter of West Bushwick Urban Renewal Area Phase 2, 69 A.D.3d 176 [2009]; see Acme Theatres v State of New York, 26 N.Y.2d 385, 388-389 [1970]; Van Kleeck v State of New York,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases