Apart from the preclusive effect of the never-vacated prior order denying a prior motion to restore by plaintiff when neither side appeared to argue the motion (CPLR 5015), plaintiff fails to explain his utter lack of diligence in prosecuting the action or show a meritorious cause of action beyond the conclusory allegations in his notice of claim (CPLR 3404; see Muriel v St. Barnabas Hosp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MAISONETTE v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY
70 A.D.3d 415 (2010)
892 N.Y.S.2d 763
ALEXIS MAISONETTE et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 2, 2010.
Decided February 2, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.