There was no evidence that defendant refused to obey an order for disclosure or wilfully failed to disclose information. Plaintiff declined the court's offer to submit interrogatories or to conduct a continued deposition of defendant. Accordingly, denial of the motion was a proper exercise of the court's discretion (Gross v Edmer Sanitary Supply Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ZAK v. MINTZ
1977, 406168/07
69 A.D.3d 454 (2010)
891 N.Y.S.2d 280
2010 NY Slip Op 207
IRINA ZAK, Appellant, v. BETTY MINTZ, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 12, 2010.
Decided January 12, 2010.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.