GERSTEN v. LEMKE

1913N, 110651/07

68 A.D.3d 681 (2009)

2009 NY Slip Op 9725

890 N.Y.S.2d 828

BEN GERSTEN, Respondent, v. DENNIS M. LEMKE, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 29, 2009.


Defendant's bare assertions of inconvenience fail to show the manner in which his proposed witnesses would be inconvenienced by having to travel between Nassau and New York Counties (see Schoen v Chase Manhattan Automotive Fin. Corp., 274 A.D.2d 345 [2000]; cf. Cardona v Aggressive Heating, 180 A.D.2d 572, 573 [1992]; Heinemann v Grunfeld, 224 A.D.2d 204

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases