Defendant's bare assertions of inconvenience fail to show the manner in which his proposed witnesses would be inconvenienced by having to travel between Nassau and New York Counties (see Schoen v Chase Manhattan Automotive Fin. Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
GERSTEN v. LEMKE
1913N, 110651/07
68 A.D.3d 681 (2009)
2009 NY Slip Op 9725
890 N.Y.S.2d 828
BEN GERSTEN, Respondent, v. DENNIS M. LEMKE, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 29, 2009.
Decided December 29, 2009.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.