Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the petitioner's cross motion, inter alia, to confirm a valuation of the respondent's shares provided by the petitioner's accountants, inasmuch as that valuation was not the independent work of the "accountants servicing the [petitioner] Corporation," as required by section 3.4 (d) of the shareholders agreement (see Matter of Trio Asbestos Removal Corp. v Marinelli,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.