Contrary to petitioner's contention, the policy of expelling a student for plagiarizing at any stage of her Master's thesis is not arbitrary, capricious or irrational. There is no indication that respondent's determination was made in bad faith as the result of discrimination based on petitioner's national origin. Since there is no issue of fact with respect to that issue, a hearing was not required (Matter of Feigman v Klepak,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF DEQUITO v. NEW SCHOOL FOR GENERAL STUDIES
1817, 113480/07
68 A.D.3d 559 (2009)
2009 NY Slip Op 9374
890 N.Y.S.2d 56
In the Matter of APRIL DEQUITO, Appellant, v. THE NEW SCHOOL FOR GENERAL STUDIES, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 17, 2009.
Decided December 17, 2009.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
