1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 68 A.D.3d
  5. 68 A.D.3d 788 (2009)
 

PEOPLE v. O'DIAH

2005-08182

68 A.D.3d 788 (2009)

2009 NY Slip Op 9049

888 N.Y.S.2d 896

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. AROR ARK O'DIAH, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided December 1, 2009.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the prosecutor's comments during summation require reversal is unpreserved for appellate review, since he failed to seek a curative instruction or move for a mistrial with respect to the one challenged comment to which he objected, and he failed to object to the other challenged comments (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 911, 912 [2006...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases