In the Matter of PARMINDER KAUR et al., Petitioners,
v.
NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Doing Business as EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Respondent.
In the Matter of TUCK-IT-AWAY, INC., et al., Petitioners,
v.
NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Doing Business as EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 3, 2009.
Decided December 3, 2009.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP, New York City ( David L. Smith of counsel), for Parminder Kaur and others, petitioners.
NARDELLI, J., concurs with CATTERSON, J.; RICHTER, J., concurs in a separate opinion; TOM, J.P., and RENWICK, J., dissent in a separate opinion by TOM, J.P.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
OPINION OF THE COURT
CATTERSON, J.
"`An ACT of the Legislature (for I cannot call it a law) contrary to the great first principles of the social compact, cannot be considered a rightful exercise of legislative authority ... A few instances will suffice to explain what I mean ... [A] law that takes property from A. and gives it to B: It is against all reason and justice, for a people to entrust a Legislature with...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
