ANDERSON v. YOUNG & RUBICAM

1640, 113140/04

68 A.D.3d 430 (2009)

2009 NY Slip Op 8956

890 N.Y.S.2d 45

KELVIN D. ANDERSON, Appellant, v. YOUNG & RUBICAM, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 3, 2009.


The verdict that plaintiff failed to prove a prima facie case of age discrimination and that the reasons defendant gave for his termination were not pretextual was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Jordan v Bates Adv. Holdings, Inc., 46 A.D.3d 440 [2007], lv denied 11 N.Y.3d 701 [2008]). The jury's determination, based largely...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases