1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 67 A.D.3d
  5. 67 A.D.3d 1031 (2009)
 

PEOPLE v. SAMPSON

2006-11915.

67 A.D.3d 1031 (2009)

890 N.Y.S.2d 557

2009 NY Slip Op 08848

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SYDNEY SAMPSON, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided November 24, 2009.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, that a statement elicited from him by police detectives should have been suppressed because he had not received Miranda warnings (see Miranda v Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444-445 [1966]) while he was in custody, is without merit. We agree with the finding of the hearing court, which is entitled to great deference, that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases