At sentencing, the court was under no obligation to conduct a sua sponte inquiry into whether there was a conflict between defendant and his counsel. Defendant never made an explicit or implicit request for new counsel at any stage of the proceedings, or a motion to withdraw his plea; on the contrary, during the plea allocution he said he was "very" satisfied with his legal representation. Accordingly, there was nothing before the court
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. FIGUEROA
1572.
67 A.D.3d 610 (2009)
892 N.Y.S.2d 7
2009 NY Slip Op 08698
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERMAN FIGUEROA, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 24, 2009.
Decided November 24, 2009.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.