PEOPLE v. DAVIS

No. 172

14 N.Y.3d 20 (2009)

2009 NY Slip Op 8676

896 N.Y.S.2d 707

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GEORGE DAVIS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided November 24, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Office of the Appellate Defender, New York City (Sara Gurwitch and Richard M. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York City (Vincent Rivellese and Patrick J. Hynes of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ and SMITH concur with Judge CIPARICK; Judge JONES dissents and votes to reverse in a separate opinion in which Judge PIGOTT concurs.


OPINION OF THE COURT

CIPARICK, J.

On this appeal, we are asked to determine whether it was error for Supreme Court to refuse to charge criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree as a lesser included offense of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree when an agency defense was properly submitted to the jury. Applying the test articulated in People v Glover (57 N.Y.2d 61

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases