ARELLANO v. HSBC BANK USA

1507.

67 A.D.3d 554 (2009)

888 N.Y.S.2d 398

2009 NY Slip Op 08491

ROD ARELLANO, Respondent, v. HSBC BANK USA et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided November 19, 2009.


The motion court should have granted defendants leave to amend the answer (see CPLR 3025 [b]). Although the motion was made approximately three years after defendants answered the complaint, plaintiff did not and could not reasonably claim to have been prejudiced or surprised by the request to amend the answer (see Solomon Holding Corp. v Golia, 55 A.D.3d 507 [2008]; Seda v New York City Hous. Auth.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases