MATTER OF VOMERO v. CITY OF NEW YORK


13 N.Y.3d 840 (2009)

In the Matter of EDWARD J. VOMERO, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided November 19, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel L. Scollar, Staten Island, and Marc E. Scollar, for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Tahirih M. Sadrieh and Edward F.X. Hart of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.

Passarello & LaRosa, Staten Island (John Z. Marangos and Richard A. LaRosa of counsel), for GAC Catering, Inc., respondent.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur in memorandum.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court reinstated.

A local zoning board has broad discretion when reviewing an application for a zoning variance, but its determination may be set aside if the record reveals that "the board acted illegally or arbitrarily, or abused its discretion" (Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases