1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 67 A.D.3d
  5. 67 A.D.3d 473 (2009)
 

PEOPLE v. QUAN HONG YE

1404.

67 A.D.3d 473 (2009)

889 N.Y.S.2d 556

2009 NY Slip Op 08064

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. QUAN HONG YE, Also Known as YE QUAN HONG, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided November 10, 2009.

The court properly admitted the testimony of a police officer concerning defendant's admissions, which were translated to him by another officer acting as an interpreter. Since the record presents no motive for the translator to mislead, nor any reason to question the accuracy of his translations, the testimony was admissible under the agency exception to the hearsay rule (see People v Romero, 78 N.Y.2d 355, 362 [1991]). The agency...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases