The court properly denied plaintiff's motion as he failed to show a likelihood of success on his claim that the loan agreement with defendant was unenforceable. The agreement provided that, in the event of a default, the parties would value plaintiff's minority stake in their closely held company pursuant to a formula. Defendant would pay plaintiff the difference between this valuation and the amount owed on the loan, and defendant would then own the shares. Contrary to plaintiff...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
