1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 66 A.D.3d
  5. 66 A.D.3d 987 (2009)
 

SERPA v. CITY OF NEW YORK

2008-06242.

66 A.D.3d 987 (2009)

886 N.Y.S.2d 811

2009 NY Slip Op 7818

MARLENE SERPA, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, and NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided October 27, 2009.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The only issue raised on appeal involves whether certain expert testimony should have been admitted into evidence. Under the circumstances of this case, the testimony in question was properly admitted (see Trimarco v Klein, 56 N.Y.2d 98 [1982]; Miller v Long Is. R.R., 212 A.D.2d 515

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases