Ordered that the order entered August 12, 2008, is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the respondents' motion to vacate their default in answering the complaint and to compel the plaintiff to accept their answer, as the defendants demonstrated both a reasonable excuse for their default and the existence of a potentially meritorious defense (see Westchester Med. Ctr. v Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.