Defendant entered his guilty pleas in consideration of a promise that he would receive a sentence to run concurrently with the sentence to be imposed for his conspiracy convictions under another indictment. As the People concede, since those convictions have been set aside, defendant is entitled to withdraw his pleas (see People v Rowland,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. VASQUEZ
1281-5663/06, 1281A, 3616/06.
66 A.D.3d 577 (2009)
886 N.Y.S.2d 603
2009 NY Slip Op 7672
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MANUEL VASQUEZ, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 27, 2009.
Decided October 27, 2009.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.