1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 69 A.D.3d
  5. 69 A.D.3d 176 (2009)
 

W. BUSHWICK URBAN RENEWAL

2008-05382

69 A.D.3d 176 (2009)

888 N.Y.S.2d 525

In the Matter of WEST BUSHWICK URBAN RENEWAL AREA, PHASE 2. GEORGE CHO et al., Appellants; CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

October 20, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Goldstein, Goldstein, Rikon & Gottlieb, P.C., New York City (Jonathan Houghton of counsel), for appellants.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Lisa Bova-Hiatt, Fred Kolikoff and Brooke Zacker of counsel), for respondent.

MASTRO, J.P., ENG and HALL, JJ., concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

DICKERSON, J.

In this case, we consider whether the claimants, each of whose real property was acquired by the condemnor, City of New York, are entitled to compensation for certain trade fixtures located on their property. We hold that, where, as here, trade fixtures are inconsistent with the highest and best use of the property that is the subject of the taking, claimants are not entitled to compensation for both the property in its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases