Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the part of the petition alleging menacing in the third degree is facially insufficient because it misidentified the complainant (see CPL 470.05[2]). In any event, the petition, taken together with the supporting deposition, clearly apprised the appellant of the conduct which is the subject of the accusation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
