1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 66 A.D.3d
  5. 66 A.D.3d 562 (2009)
 

SASS v. SASS

1254, 311895/07.

66 A.D.3d 562 (2009)

886 N.Y.S.2d 597

2009 NY Slip Op 7500

PETER SASS, Respondent, v. SOPHIA SASS, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 22, 2009.

Defendant's argument that the judgment includes terms that are inconsistent with the stipulation of settlement and therefore does not accurately reflect the stipulation is not preserved for appellate review (see 22 NYCRR 202.48 [c] [2]; Rowley v Amrhein, 64 A.D.3d 469 [2009]).

Defendant failed to establish that she entered into the stipulation under duress (see Mahon v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases