GROGAN v. NIZAM

2008-01181.

66 A.D.3d 734 (2009)

887 N.Y.S.2d 607

2009 NY Slip Op 7375

DIANE GROGAN et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. MOHAMMED NIZAM et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided October 13, 2009.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the defendants.

In this medical malpractice action, the plaintiffs Diane Grogan and Edward Grogan allege that the defendant Dr. Mohammed Nizam performed an unnecessary hysterectomy and cystocele on the plaintiff Diane Grogan.

In August 2007 the matter was tried before a jury. During the plaintiffs' case, their counsel inquired of their own expert whether he was involved in any risk management work. The plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases